Need More Proof that Corporate Wellness Programs can Reduce Your Health Care Costs

Here are some quotes from recent peer reviewed journal articles documenting your projected savings.

Return on Investment

“A meta-analysis of workplace disease prevention and wellness programs found that for every dollar spent on the program, medical costs dropped by about US $3.27 and absenteeism costs dropped by about US $2.73.”
Source: Health Affairs (February 2010)

“A study was conducted to determine the return on investment (ROI) of Highmark Inc.'s employee wellness programs by comparing medical claims with wellness program participants versus risk-matched non-participants from 2001 -2005. Multivariate models estimated health care expenses per person per year as $176 lower for participants. Inpatient expenses were lower by $182. Four-year savings of $1,335,524 compared with program expenses of $808,403 yielded an ROI of $1.65 for every dollar spent on the program. The conclusions using sophisticated methodology, suggests that a comprehensive health promotion program can lower the rate of health care cost increases and produce a positive ROI.”
Source: Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine (February 2008)

Productivity Savings

“A study shows a positive correlation between reducing employee health risks and enhancing productivity. More than 770,000 employees in 106 companies participated in the study. Employees who had none of the eight assessed health risks had a productivity loss of 3% while those with eight health risks had a 24% productivity loss. Data was taken from employee’s health risk assessment. Translated into dollars, on average, in this study, employees with low health risks cost their employer $1,472 per year in lost productivity compared to employees with three health risks who cost the company $5,952 in lost productivity. Researchers estimated, that if 100 employees with three health risks each eradicated one risk factor, the employer would gain $149,400 in productivity.”
Source: Journal of Occupation and Environmental Medicine (April 2009)

Revenue

“Companies with an effective health and productivity program:

  • Yield more revenue
  • Have a higher market share
  • Deliver higher share holder return
  • Have lower costs in long term disability, short term disability and general health care coverage”
Source: Journal of Occupation and Environmental Medicine (September 2008)

“Although many employers are interested in health management for employees who consume 80% of the health care costs and are at risk of health problems, it is critically important to continue to support employees with low health risks so that they stay at low risk.”
Source: American Journal of Health Promotion (May/June 2007)

Loyalty and Retention

“Wellness programs are attracting more workers and not just from large companies. Organizations with less than 1,000 employees had a 79% participation rate in on-site health screenings in 2006 up from 68% in 2005. What’s more, 60% of workers took advantage of fitness facilities offered by their companies in 2006, compared to 38% in 2005. Another 65% of workers created a personalized health program to address high-risk conditions last year, up from 45% in 2005. Slightly more than half of employees feel a wellness program strengthens their loyalty to the company and motivates them to work harder and better. Sixty-one percent of workers believe employer-sponsored wellness programs can fight against escalating health care costs. Reduced personal health care costs are one of the reasons 38% of employees would be willing to sign up for a wellness program.”
Source: Employee Benefit News (February 2007)

Obesity Trends

“In a study conducted by the University of Michigan and Harvard University which forecasted life expectancy based on obesity and smoking in the US, the researchers found that if the current obesity trends continue, its negative effects ‘will greatly outweigh the positive effects gained from declining smoking rates.’ The authors state, “In the past 15 years smoking rates have declined by 20%, but obesity rates have increased by 48%. If past trends continue, nearly half of the population - 45% - is projected to be obese by 2020.”
Source: University of Michigan and Harvard University Study, published by England Journal of Medicine (December 2009)

True Economic Burden of Disease

“For every dollar spent on medical and pharmaceutical costs, there is $2.30 of health-related productivity losses due to absenteeism and presenteeism. For some individuals, such as employees who suffer from anxiety, employers lose as much as $20 in productivity for every dollar they spend on medical care and pharmaceuticals.”
Source: Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine (April 2009)

Costs of Obesity

“Here are some statistics on obesity:

  • 26% of Americans are obese.
  • 73% of employers view offering obesity-related services as effective.
  • 67% of employers are concerned about the effects of obesity on medical claims expenses.

The estimated cost of obesity in a hypothetical 1-million-member health plan is $29 per member per month.
  • Over a nine-year period, obese people spend twice as much on drugs, compared to healthy-weight people.
  • Employees with a BMI over 40 had twice as many workers' compensation claims as employees at their recommended weight.
  • In the United States, the number of bariatric procedures climbed from 20,000 in 1996 to more than 100,000 in 2003.”
Source: The Milken Institute and the Disease Management Association of America (2009)

Incentives Matter

“A study found that monetary incentives helped individuals lose weight in the short run. ‘Incentive approaches based on behavioral economic concepts appear to be highly effective in inducing initial weight loss’ – thus the success of Biggest Loser programs.”
Source: Journal of the American Medical Association 2009

Importance of Strong Communications Programs

“Incentive value and the communications and organizational commitment are the strongest predictors of HRA completion rates. To achieve a 50% completion of an HRA, an organization with a low level or organizational commitment and limited communications needs an approximate incentive value of $120 for completion, whereas an organization with high commitment and good communications needs only $40.
Health care expenditures are nearly 50% greater for workers who report high levels of stress.”
Source: Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine (August 2008)

Soft Benefits of Wellness Programs

“Health promotion literature also documents the value of worksite wellness programs in other important aspects:

  • Improvements in employee moral
  • Increased employee loyalty
  • Less organizational conflict
  • More productive work force
  • Improved employee decision-making ability”
Source: Summex Health Management (2005)